Connor Boyle

5 September 2026

In Many Languages, to "Reign" is to "Righten"

by Connor Boyle

tags: historylinguistics

The English word “ruler” can refer to a person who governs a state, or to an object that is famously very straight. (image of King Charles III, courtesy of the Government of the United Kingdom)


An Ancient Aphorism

季康子問政於孔子。孔子對曰:「政者,正也。子帥以正,孰敢不正?」

Ji Kang asked Confucius about government. Confucius replied, “To govern means to rectify. If you lead on the people with correctness, who will dare not to be correct?”

(Analects 12.17, trans. James Legge)

The above is a quite well-known quotation of Confucius, and yet I don’t think I have ever encountered an English translation that quite does it justice. In particular, translations such as Legge’s fail to reflect that the Classical Chinese words translated as “govern” (zhèng 政) and “rectify” (zhèng 正) are homophones—which adds a certain pithiness to Confucius’s dictum.

In an attempt to improve upon Professor Legge’s glosses, I considered several synonyms for “govern” such as “lead”, “command”, and “rule”; I ultimately landed on “reign”. “Reign” and “rectify” already give us a nice alliteration, but the overlap in sounds can be increased even more by swapping “rectify” for “righten”, giving us:

Ji Kang asked Confucius about government. Confucius replied, “To reign means to righten. If you lead on the people with rightness, who will dare not to be right?”

A Contemporary Connection

Now, according to the ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese, it is not merely by coincidence that the words for “reign” and “righten” (Old Chinese *tsjäŋ 政 and *tsjäŋ 正, respectively) are and were homophones; these two words were in fact etymologically-related (Schuessler p. 612). More than that, it appears that they were originally one and the same word, whose literal meaning, “righten”, was extended by metaphor to mean “reign”, with the latter sense eventually receiving its own Chinese character (政).

Do the English words “reign” and “righten” have a similar etymological relationship? As it turns out, yes! The English word “reign” comes (via Anglo-Norman French, see the Anglo-Norman Dictionary) from the Latin regnāre (meaning “to rule as king”), a derivation from rēx (meaning “king”), which itself comes (via Proto-Italic *rēg-) from the Proto-Indo-European *h₃rēǵ-s (meaning the same, de Vaan p. 522).

The Proto-Indo-European *h₃rēǵ-s itself comes from the root *h₃reǵ- (Mallory p. 329), meaning “move in a straight line; extend, stretch” (Mallory p. 187). A “king” in Proto-Indo-European was, literally, “one who makes things right” (Anthony p. 160).

The Proto-Indo-European word *h₃reǵtos,1 meaning “right”—also derived from this root—became *rehta- (“straight”) in Proto-Germanic, which became riht in Old English, and finally “right” in Modern English (Kroonen p. 408). “Right” combines with the suffix “-en” to form “righten”, thus completing our millennia-long etymological chain connecting “reign” to “righten”!

flowchart BT
A("*h₃reǵ
'move in a straight line; extend; stretch'") B("*h₃rēǵ-s
'king'") C("*h₃reǵtos
'right'") D("*rehta
'straight'") E("rēx
'king'") F("regnāre
'to rule as a king'") G("reignier
'to reign'") H("reign") I("riht
'right'") J("right") K("righten") subgraph Proto-Indo-European A == derived ==> B A == derived ==> C end subgraph Proto-Germanic C -- inherited --> D end subgraph Latin B -- inherited --> E E == derived ==> F end subgraph Old French F -- inherited --> G end subgraph Old English D -- inherited --> I end subgraph English G -. borrowed .-> H I -- inherited --> J J == derived ==> K end

This metaphor—of a governor, king, or ruler as one who “straightens” a society, its laws, or its people—might seem a bit foreign to a modern reader. Yet, it has not re-occurred even in modern English: “rule” can mean “to govern”, or it can mean “to mark with a straight line”, as in “college-ruled notebook”.

References


Footnotes:

  1. Kroonen and Mallory differ on how they record this Proto-Indo-European word, with the former giving *h₃reǵ-to- and the latter giving *h₃reǵtos. I am sadly not knowledgeable enough about Indo-European linguistics to know whether this is a disagreement on substance or a mere difference in convention. 

tags: history - linguistics

Find me on:

Blog posts:

2026-09-05 In Many Languages, to "Reign" is to "Righten"

historylinguistics

2026-06-28 MIT Researchers Named Their Project After a Paper They Don't Seem to Have Read

science

2026-05-02 Fast Fourier Transforms Part 3: Bluestein's Algorithm

mathematicssoftware

2026-04-27 Fast Fourier Transforms Part 2: Cyclic Convolution

mathematicssoftware

2026-04-09 Confucius has Never Been more Right than Today (Unless You're Reading this After July 26, 2102)

astronomyhistorysoftware

2025-09-11 Fast Fourier Transforms Part 1: Cooley-Tukey

mathematicssoftware

2025-05-23 Rep. Paul Gosar's Claims about OPT Contain Major Errors

politicsimmigration

2025-04-07 I Found Out I'm Colorblind, So I Made a Program to Generate Images That I Can't Read

softwarecolorblindness

2024-11-05 Flipping Coins in 100,000 Universes Wouldn't Be as Close as the Polls in Wisconsin

politicsstatistics

2024-08-17 How to build & push a Docker image directly to Minikube

software

2023-12-17 Scikit-Learn's F-1 calculator is broken

softwarestatistics

Hosted on GitHub Pages — Theme by orderedlist